Claude Opus 4.6 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Claude Opus 4.6 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | #7 of 2276.2 score | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #27 of 36$0.241 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | #11 of 2252.1 score | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.6 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Family | Claude 4 | Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b Bf16 |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.6 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16 |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.6 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-05 | 2026-06-04 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-05-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 262K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 560.5B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 55B |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Claude Opus 4.6 Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.6 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+
Claude Opus 4.6 is $5.00 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $0.50 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.6 is $25.00 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $2.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+
Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 be self-hosted?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Opus 4.6 is not marked open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.6 is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.6 is 128K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is —.
Do Claude Opus 4.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+
Claude Opus 4.6 has 1 sourced provider route; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 has 3, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.