o3 vs Hunyuan3D 2.1
At a Glance
| Compare | o3OpenAI | Hunyuan3D 2.1Tencent |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $4.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | o3 | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Family | O3 | Hunyuan3d 2 1 |
| Model | o3 | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
| Version | o3 | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-16 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Image |
| Output modalities | Text | 3D |
| Context window | 200K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | generation |
o3 Capabilities
Hunyuan3D 2.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
o3 vs Hunyuan3D 2.1 FAQs
Is o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both o3 and Hunyuan3D 2.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Only o3 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only o3 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. o3 is 200K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1 be self-hosted?+
Hunyuan3D 2.1 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. o3 is not marked open weight; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is open weight.
Can o3 and Hunyuan3D 2.1 understand images?+
o3 is documented with image input; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. o3 is 100K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.
Do o3 and Hunyuan3D 2.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
o3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hunyuan3D 2.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
o3 has 2 sourced provider routes; Hunyuan3D 2.1 has 0, so o3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, o3 or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.