o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both o3 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

o3 is $1.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so o3 is cheaper on this metric. o3 is $4.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so o3 is cheaper on this metric.

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. o3 supports 200K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. o3 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

o3 is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced maximum output: o3 supports 100K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 131K output tokens.

o3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

o3 has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.