o3-pro vs Hunyuan3D 2.1

At a Glance

Compare
o3-proOpenAI
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$20.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$80.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldo3-proHunyuan3D-2.1
DeveloperOpenAITencent
FamilyO3Hunyuan3d 2 1
Modelo3-proHunyuan3D-2.1
Versiono3-proHunyuan3D-2.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-06-10Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageImage
Output modalitiesText3D
Context window200KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsgeneration

o3-pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3-pro

Hunyuan3D 2.1 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDtencent/Hunyuan3D-2.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

o3-pro vs Hunyuan3D 2.1 FAQs

Is o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both o3-pro and Hunyuan3D 2.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+

Only o3-pro has a directly sourced input price: $20.00 per million tokens. Only o3-pro has a directly sourced output price: $80.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. o3-pro is 200K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1 be self-hosted?+

Hunyuan3D 2.1 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. o3-pro is not marked open weight; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is open weight.

Can o3-pro and Hunyuan3D 2.1 understand images?+

o3-pro is documented with image input; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. o3-pro is 100K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.

Do o3-pro and Hunyuan3D 2.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hunyuan3D 2.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+

o3-pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Hunyuan3D 2.1 has 0, so o3-pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, o3-pro or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback