o3-pro vs Grok 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
o3-proOpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#25 of 4660.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#15 of 44$0.063 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#11 of 3859.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$20.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026$2.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$80.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026$6.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K500K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldo3-proGrok 4.5
DeveloperOpenAIxAI
FamilyO3Grok 4
Modelo3-proGrok 4.5
Versiono3-proGrok 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-06-102026-07-16
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K500K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

o3-pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3-pro

Grok 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

o3-pro vs Grok 4.5 FAQs

Is o3-pro or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both o3-pro and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Grok 4.5?+

o3-pro is $20.00 and Grok 4.5 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. o3-pro is $80.00 and Grok 4.5 is $6.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, o3-pro or Grok 4.5?+

Grok 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. o3-pro supports 200K and Grok 4.5 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, o3-pro or Grok 4.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can o3-pro or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. o3-pro is not marked open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can o3-pro and Grok 4.5 understand images?+

o3-pro is documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, o3-pro or Grok 4.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. o3-pro is 100K and Grok 4.5 is —.

Do o3-pro and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, o3-pro or Grok 4.5?+

o3-pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so o3-pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, o3-pro or Grok 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback