o3-pro vs GLM 5V Turbo
At a Glance
| Compare |  o3-proOpenAI |  GLM 5V TurboZ.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $20.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $80.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 200K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | o3-pro | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Z.ai |
| Family | O3 | Glm 5v |
| Model | o3-pro | GLM-5V-Turbo |
| Version | o3-pro | GLM-5V-Turbo |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 200K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, tools, vision |
o3-pro Capabilities
GLM 5V Turbo Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | o3-proOpenAI | developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
o3-proOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
o3-proOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
o3-proOpenAI | vs | GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
o3-proOpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
o3-pro vs GLM 5V Turbo FAQs
Is o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both o3-pro and GLM 5V Turbo, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo?+
Only o3-pro has a directly sourced input price: $20.00 per million tokens. Only o3-pro has a directly sourced output price: $80.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. o3-pro is 200K and GLM 5V Turbo is 200K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. o3-pro is not marked open weight; GLM 5V Turbo is not marked open weight.
Can o3-pro and GLM 5V Turbo understand images?+
o3-pro is documented with image input; GLM 5V Turbo is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo?+
GLM 5V Turbo has the larger sourced maximum output: o3-pro supports 100K and GLM 5V Turbo supports 131K output tokens.
Do o3-pro and GLM 5V Turbo support reasoning and tool use?+
o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GLM 5V Turbo: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo?+
o3-pro has 2 sourced provider routes; GLM 5V Turbo has 1, so o3-pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, o3-pro or GLM 5V Turbo?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.