NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
At a Glance
| Compare |  MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.050Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.435Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.87Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | NVIDIA | Xiaomi |
| Family | Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16 | Mimo V2 6 |
| Model | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Version | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-15 | 2026-09-21 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-11-28 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 31.6B | 1T |
| Active parameters | 3.5B | 42B |
| License | other | MIT |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities
MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs
Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.435 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.87 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced context window. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.
Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 1,049K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 131K output tokens.
Do NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3 sourced provider routes; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.