NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs Inkling

At a Glance

Compare
InklingThinking Machines Lab
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.050Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026$0.95Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.20Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026$4.05Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Inkling
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,348.4494% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.98546755, 1353.88978012]; votes 15325; rank 1951,439.68100% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Inkling
DeveloperNVIDIAThinking Machines Lab
FamilyNvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16Inkling
ModelNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Inkling
VersionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Inkling
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-152026-07-15
Knowledge cutoff2025-11-28Unknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters31.6B975B
Active parameters3.5B41B
Licenseotherapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

Inkling Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDthinkingmachines/Inkling

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs Inkling FAQs

Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling?+

Inkling has the larger sourced context window. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K and Inkling supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight; Inkling is open weight.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Inkling understand images?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is 1,049K and Inkling is —.

Do NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, so Inkling has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Inkling?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback