NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs Grok 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#25 of 4660.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#15 of 44$0.063 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#11 of 3859.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.050Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026$2.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.20Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026$6.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K500K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Grok 4.5
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,348.4493% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.98546755, 1353.88978012]; votes 15325; rank 1951,450.13100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1445.44268767, 1454.81726995]; votes 30103; rank 45
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Grok 4.5
DeveloperNVIDIAxAI
FamilyNvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16Grok 4
ModelNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Grok 4.5
VersionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Grok 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-152026-07-16
Knowledge cutoff2025-11-28Unknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K500K
Total parameters31.6BUnknown
Active parameters3.5BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

Grok 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs Grok 4.5 FAQs

Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 and Grok 4.5 is $2.00 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 and Grok 4.5 is $6.00 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5?+

Grok 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K and Grok 4.5 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Grok 4.5 understand images?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is 1,049K and Grok 4.5 is —.

Do NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback