Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ministral 8B Instruct 2410
At a Glance
| Compare | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | Ministral 8B Instruct 2410Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.20Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | 33K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Muse Glimmer 30B | Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Family | Muse Glimmer | Ministral 8b Instruct 2410 |
| Model | Muse Glimmer 30B | Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 |
| Version | Muse Glimmer 30B | Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-08-09 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01-04 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 33K |
| Total parameters | 29.8B | 8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, tools |
Muse Glimmer 30B Capabilities
Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 FAQs
Is Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Glimmer 30B and Ministral 8B Instruct 2410, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410?+
Only Muse Glimmer 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.30 per million tokens. Only Muse Glimmer 30B has a directly sourced output price: $1.20 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410?+
Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger sourced context window. Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131K and Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 supports 33K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Muse Glimmer 30B is open weight; Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 is open weight.
Can Muse Glimmer 30B and Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 understand images?+
Muse Glimmer 30B is documented with image input; Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Glimmer 30B is — and Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 is —.
Do Muse Glimmer 30B and Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 support reasoning and tool use?+
Muse Glimmer 30B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Ministral 8B Instruct 2410: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410?+
Muse Glimmer 30B has 3 sourced provider routes; Ministral 8B Instruct 2410 has 0, so Muse Glimmer 30B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ministral 8B Instruct 2410?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.