Muse Glimmer 30B vs Kimi K3

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingMuse Glimmer 30BKimi-K3
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#11 of 2271.3 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#13 of 2251.7 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BKimi-K3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,391.9194% of row best · rating · muse-glimmer; 95% CI [1382.01378668, 1401.79860600]; votes 3696; rank 1481,476.31100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1470.86166728, 1481.76254962]; votes 17895; rank 16
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Meta · activeMuse Glimmer 30BVerified Sep 3, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldMuse Glimmer 30BKimi-K3
DeveloperMetaMoonshot AI
FamilyMuse GlimmerKimi K3
ModelMuse Glimmer 30BKimi-K3
VersionMuse Glimmer 30BKimi-K3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-092026-07-16
Knowledge cutoff2026-01-04Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K1,049K
Total parameters29.8B2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
Licenseapache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning

16 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Muse Glimmer 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.30
Output price$1.20
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmeta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Glimmer 30B and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3?+

Muse Glimmer 30B is $0.30 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on this metric. Muse Glimmer 30B is $1.20 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131K and Kimi K3 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Muse Glimmer 30B is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can Muse Glimmer 30B and Kimi K3 understand images?+

Muse Glimmer 30B is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Glimmer 30B is — and Kimi K3 is —.

Do Muse Glimmer 30B and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Glimmer 30B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3?+

Muse Glimmer 30B has 3 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Glimmer 30B or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback