MolmoWeb 4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.30Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.20Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens10K131K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMolmoWeb 4BMuse Glimmer 30B
DeveloperAi2Meta
FamilyMolmowebMuse Glimmer
ModelMolmoWeb 4BMuse Glimmer 30B
VersionMolmoWeb 4BMuse Glimmer 30B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-202026-08-09
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-01-04
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window10K131K
Total parameters4.9B29.8B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableNoYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

MolmoWeb 4B Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationtoolsvision
Serving providers0
Canonical IDallenai/MolmoWeb-4B

Muse Glimmer 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmeta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

MolmoWeb 4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B FAQs

Is MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MolmoWeb 4B and Muse Glimmer 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B?+

Only Muse Glimmer 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.30 per million tokens. Only Muse Glimmer 30B has a directly sourced output price: $1.20 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B?+

Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger sourced context window. MolmoWeb 4B supports 10K and Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. MolmoWeb 4B is open weight; Muse Glimmer 30B is open weight.

Can MolmoWeb 4B and Muse Glimmer 30B understand images?+

MolmoWeb 4B is documented with image input; Muse Glimmer 30B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MolmoWeb 4B is — and Muse Glimmer 30B is —.

Do MolmoWeb 4B and Muse Glimmer 30B support reasoning and tool use?+

MolmoWeb 4B: tool calling and image input. Muse Glimmer 30B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B?+

MolmoWeb 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; Muse Glimmer 30B has 3, so Muse Glimmer 30B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, MolmoWeb 4B or Muse Glimmer 30B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback