MolmoWeb 4B vs Mistral Large 3
At a Glance
| Compare | MolmoWeb 4BAi2 | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #28 of 5743.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 14.3–81.0 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.25Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.75Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 10K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | MolmoWeb 4B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ai2 | Mistral AI |
| Family | Molmoweb | Mistral Large 3 |
| Model | MolmoWeb 4B | Mistral Large 3 |
| Version | MolmoWeb 4B | Mistral Large 3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-20 | 2025-12-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 10K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 4.9B | 675B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 41B |
| License | apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, computer-use, generation, tools, vision | agents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
MolmoWeb 4B Capabilities
Mistral Large 3 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
MolmoWeb 4B vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs
Is MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MolmoWeb 4B and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3?+
Only Mistral Large 3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.25 per million tokens. Only Mistral Large 3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.75 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3?+
Mistral Large 3 has the larger sourced context window. MolmoWeb 4B supports 10,240 tokens and Mistral Large 3 supports 262,144 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. MolmoWeb 4B is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.
Can MolmoWeb 4B and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+
MolmoWeb 4B is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do MolmoWeb 4B and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+
MolmoWeb 4B: tool calling and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3?+
MolmoWeb 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Mistral Large 3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, MolmoWeb 4B or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.