MolmoAct 2 vs Claude Opus 4.6
At a Glance
| Compare |  MolmoAct 2Ai2 | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #12 of 4676.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #33 of 44$0.241 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #19 of 3853.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | MolmoAct 2 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ai2 | Anthropic |
| Family | MolmoAct 2 | Claude 4 |
| Model | MolmoAct 2 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Version | 2 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | 2026-02-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-05-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Robot state | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Robot action | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 5B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Anthropic (Standard) |
| Capabilities | action-reasoning, bimanual-manipulation, depth-reasoning, fine-tuning | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
| Robotics model type | Action reasoning model | Unknown |
| Action representation | Flow-matching continuous action expert | Unknown |
| Control architecture | Molmo 2-ER backbone with KV-cache bridge and action expert | Unknown |
| Inference location | Flexible | Unknown |
| Native control rate (Hz) | Unknown | Unknown |
| Supported embodiments | SO-100, SO-101, Franka, WidowX, bimanual YAM | Unknown |
| Training data | Open bimanual YAM, SO-100/SO-101, DROID, BC-Z, Fractal, Bridge, and prior MolmoAct data described by Ai2. | Unknown |
MolmoAct 2 Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.6 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peers |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | MolmoAct 2Ai2 | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peers |
MolmoAct 2Ai2 | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peers |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
MolmoAct 2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 FAQs
Is MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MolmoAct 2 and Claude Opus 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Only Claude Opus 4.6 has a directly sourced input price: $5.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Opus 4.6 has a directly sourced output price: $25.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. MolmoAct 2 is — and Claude Opus 4.6 is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6 be self-hosted?+
MolmoAct 2 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. MolmoAct 2 is open weight; Claude Opus 4.6 is not marked open weight.
Can MolmoAct 2 and Claude Opus 4.6 understand images?+
MolmoAct 2 is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MolmoAct 2 is — and Claude Opus 4.6 is 128K.
Do MolmoAct 2 and Claude Opus 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
MolmoAct 2: reasoning and image input. Claude Opus 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
MolmoAct 2 has 0 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.6 has 1, so Claude Opus 4.6 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, MolmoAct 2 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.