Lyria 3.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
At a Glance
| Compare |  Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.050Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.080Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Lyria 3.5 | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Lyria | Llama 3 1 8b Instruct |
| Model | Lyria 3.5 | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
| Version | Lyria 3.5 | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-07-29 | 2024-07-23 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text, Audio | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 131K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | llama3.1 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocals | chat, generation, tools |
Lyria 3.5 Capabilities
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Lyria 3.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct FAQs
Is Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Lyria 3.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?+
Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.050 per million tokens. Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.080 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?+
Lyria 3.5 has the larger sourced context window. Lyria 3.5 supports 1,049K and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct be self-hosted?+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is open weight.
Can Lyria 3.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct understand images?+
Lyria 3.5 is documented with image input; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Lyria 3.5 is 66K and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is —.
Do Lyria 3.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Lyria 3.5: image input. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?+
Lyria 3.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Lyria 3.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.