Lyria 3.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

At a Glance

Compare
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#6 of 4684.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#41 of 44$0.520 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#27 of 3849.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$10.00Openai · Sep 4, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$50.00Openai · Sep 4, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,050K
Model facts checkedSep 22, 2026View model evidence →Sep 4, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLyria 3.5GPT-6 Astra
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyLyriaGpt 6
ModelLyria 3.5GPT-6 Astra
VersionLyria 3.5GPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-292026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesText, AudioText
Context window1,049K1,050K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesgeneration, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocalschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

Lyria 3.5 Capabilities

generationimage-to-musiclyricsmusic-generationsynthidvocals
Serving providers2
Canonical IDlyria-3.5

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Lyria 3.5 vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Lyria 3.5 and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Only GPT-6 Astra has a directly sourced input price: $10.00 per million tokens. Only GPT-6 Astra has a directly sourced output price: $50.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Lyria 3.5 supports 1,049K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Lyria 3.5 and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Lyria 3.5 is documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced maximum output: Lyria 3.5 supports 66K and GPT-6 Astra supports 128K output tokens.

Do Lyria 3.5 and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Lyria 3.5: image input. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Lyria 3.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Lyria 3.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback