Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
At a Glance
| Compare |  MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.1875Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 | $0.435Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.6525Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 | $0.87Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Family | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct | Mimo V2 6 |
| Model | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Version | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 401.6B | 1T |
| Active parameters | 17B | 42B |
| License | other | MIT |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities
MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs
Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.1875 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.435 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.6525 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.87 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is — and MiMo V2.6 Pro is 131K.
Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so MiMo V2.6 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.