Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Grok Build 0.1
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #1 of 36$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | xAI |
| Family | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct | Grok Build |
| Model | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 256K |
| Total parameters | 401.6B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 17B | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.20 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.696 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.