Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.10Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-8BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
DeveloperMetaMeta
FamilyLlama 3 1 8bLlama 3 3 70b Instruct
ModelLlama-3.1-8BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
VersionLlama-3.1-8BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-232024-12-06
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters8B70.6B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1llama3.3
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, tools

Llama 3.1 8B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 8B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.10 per million tokens. Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.32 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Llama 3.1 8B is 131K and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 3.1 8B is open weight; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 8B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct understand images?+

Llama 3.1 8B is not documented with image input; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 8B is — and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is —.

Do Llama 3.1 8B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 8B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

Llama 3.1 8B has 1 sourced provider route; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 3, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback