Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen3 VL Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405BQwen3 VL Flash
DeveloperMetaQwen
FamilyLlama 3 1 405bQwen3 VL
ModelLlama-3.1-405BQwen3 VL Flash
VersionLlama-3.1-405BQwen3 VL Flash
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-232026-01-22
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K262K
Total parameters405.9BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Llama 3.1 405B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B

Qwen3 VL Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers1
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3-vl-flash

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen3 VL Flash FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B and Qwen3 VL Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

Only Qwen3 VL Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only Qwen3 VL Flash has a directly sourced output price: $1.50 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

Qwen3 VL Flash has the larger sourced context window. Llama 3.1 405B supports 131K and Qwen3 VL Flash supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash be self-hosted?+

Llama 3.1 405B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Llama 3.1 405B is open weight; Qwen3 VL Flash is not marked open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B and Qwen3 VL Flash understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B is not documented with image input; Qwen3 VL Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 405B is — and Qwen3 VL Flash is —.

Do Llama 3.1 405B and Qwen3 VL Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Qwen3 VL Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

Llama 3.1 405B has 1 sourced provider route; Qwen3 VL Flash has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback