Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkKimi-K3Grok 4.5
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader94.50100% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)87.1792% of row best · percent · Grok 4.5 (Medium)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader60.42100% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)52.6487% of row best · percent · Grok 4.5 (Medium)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,476.31100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1470.86166728, 1481.76254962]; votes 17895; rank 161,451.8298% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1446.90989155, 1456.73122428]; votes 25873; rank 39
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.02100% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case80.0199% of row best · percent · grok-4.5 · 10,517 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader88.19100% of row best · points · Kimi K3 · 15,023 output tokens / case82.2393% of row best · points · Grok 4.5 · 2,688 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above5 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026
xAI · activeGrok 4.5Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldKimi-K3Grok 4.5
DeveloperMoonshot AIxAI
FamilyKimi K3Grok 4
ModelKimi-K3Grok 4.5
VersionKimi-K3Grok 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-162026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K500K
Total parameters2.8TUnknown
Active parameters104BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

14 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Grok 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.5

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsembedding, image, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5 FAQs

Is Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5?+

Kimi K3 is $2.85 and Grok 4.5 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K3 is $14.25 and Grok 4.5 is $6.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K3 supports 1,049K and Grok 4.5 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5?+

Kimi K3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 4 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Kimi K3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Kimi K3 is open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Kimi K3 and Grok 4.5 understand images?+

Kimi K3 is documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K3 is — and Grok 4.5 is —.

Do Kimi K3 and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5?+

Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or Grok 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback