Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K2.5Verified Aug 28, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-6 AstraVerified Sep 4, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldKimi-K2.5GPT-6 Astra
DeveloperMoonshot AIOpenAI
FamilyKimi K2 5Gpt 6
ModelKimi-K2.5GPT-6 Astra
VersionKimi-K2.5GPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-01-272026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,050K
Total parameters1TUnknown
Active parameters32BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Kimi K2.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.45
Output price$2.25
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.5

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsembedding, image, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.5 and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Kimi K2.5 is $0.45 and GPT-6 Astra is $10.00 per million tokens, so Kimi K2.5 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K2.5 is $2.25 and GPT-6 Astra is $50.00 per million tokens, so Kimi K2.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K2.5 supports 262K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Kimi K2.5 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Kimi K2.5 is open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Kimi K2.5 and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Kimi K2.5 is documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.5 is — and GPT-6 Astra is 128K.

Do Kimi K2.5 and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Kimi K2.5 has 3 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, so Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback