Hy3 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

At a Glance

Compare
Hy3Tencent
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.13Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$0.435Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.528Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026$0.87Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 22, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldHy3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeveloperTencentXiaomi
FamilyHy3Mimo V2 6
ModelHy3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
VersionHy3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-09-21
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters298.8B1T
Active parameters21B42B
Licenseapache-2.0MIT
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDxiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Hy3 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs

Is Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Hy3 and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Hy3 is $0.13 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.435 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric. Hy3 is $0.528 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.87 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Hy3 supports 262K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Hy3 is open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.

Can Hy3 and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+

Hy3 is not documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Hy3 is — and MiMo V2.6 Pro is 131K.

Do Hy3 and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Hy3: tool calling. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Hy3 has 3 sourced provider routes; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Hy3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback