Hy3 vs GLM 5V Turbo
At a Glance
| Compare | Hy3Tencent | GLM 5V TurboZ.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.13Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.528Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 200K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Hy3 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Tencent | Z.ai |
| Family | Hy3 | Glm 5v |
| Model | Hy3 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
| Version | Hy3 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Total parameters | 298.8B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 21B | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, tools, vision |
Hy3 Capabilities
GLM 5V Turbo Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Hy3 vs GLM 5V Turbo FAQs
Is Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Hy3 and GLM 5V Turbo, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo?+
Only Hy3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.13 per million tokens. Only Hy3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.528 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo?+
Hy3 has the larger sourced context window. Hy3 supports 262K and GLM 5V Turbo supports 200K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo be self-hosted?+
Hy3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Hy3 is open weight; GLM 5V Turbo is not marked open weight.
Can Hy3 and GLM 5V Turbo understand images?+
Hy3 is not documented with image input; GLM 5V Turbo is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Hy3 is — and GLM 5V Turbo is 131K.
Do Hy3 and GLM 5V Turbo support reasoning and tool use?+
Hy3: tool calling. GLM 5V Turbo: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo?+
Hy3 has 3 sourced provider routes; GLM 5V Turbo has 1, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Hy3 or GLM 5V Turbo?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.