Helix 02 vs Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2
At a Glance
| Compare |  Helix 02Figure | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 33K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Helix 02 | granite-embedding-311m-multilingual-r2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Figure | IBM |
| Family | Helix | Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual R2 |
| Model | Helix 02 | granite-embedding-311m-multilingual-r2 |
| Version | 02 | granite-embedding-311m-multilingual-r2 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-01-05 | 2026-04-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Robot state | Text |
| Output modalities | Robot action | Embedding |
| Context window | Unknown | 33K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 311.7M |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Hugging Face (Standard) |
| Capabilities | dexterous-manipulation, long-horizon-control, tactile-control, whole-body-control | embeddings |
| Robotics model type | Vision-language-action model | Unknown |
| Action representation | Full-body joint targets | Unknown |
| Control architecture | Semantic reasoning, visuomotor policy, and kHz whole-body controller | Unknown |
| Inference location | On device | Unknown |
| Native control rate (Hz) | Unknown | Unknown |
| Supported embodiments | Figure 03 | Unknown |
| Training data | Figure reports more than 1,000 hours of human motion data plus sim-to-real reinforcement learning for its whole-body controller. | Unknown |
Helix 02 Capabilities
Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Helix 02Figure | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peers |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Helix 02Figure | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peers |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Helix 02Figure | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peers |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Helix 02Figure | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peers |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Helix 02Figure | cross-developer peers |
Helix 02Figure | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peers |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Helix 02 vs Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 FAQs
Is Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Helix 02 and Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Helix 02 is — and Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 is 33K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 be self-hosted?+
Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Helix 02 is not marked open weight; Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 is open weight.
Can Helix 02 and Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 understand images?+
Helix 02 is documented with image input; Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Helix 02 is — and Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 is —.
Do Helix 02 and Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 support reasoning and tool use?+
Helix 02: image input. Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2?+
Helix 02 has 0 sourced provider routes; Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 has 1, so Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Helix 02 or Granite Embedding 311m Multilingual r2?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.