Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC vs Hy4 preview

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.834Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.501Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Sep 2, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGranite Speech 5.0 TurboCTCHy4 preview
DeveloperIBMTencent
FamilyGranite Speech 5 0Hy4
ModelGranite Speech 5.0 TurboCTCHy4 preview
VersionGranite Speech 5.0 TurboCTCHy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-08-252026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesAudioText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown1,000K
Total parameters473M770B
Active parametersUnknown49B
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableNoYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesautomatic-speech-recognition, transcriptionchat, generation, reasoning, tools

Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC Capabilities

automatic-speech-recognitiontranscription
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-speech-5.0-470m-turboctc

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview?+

Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced input price: $0.834 per million tokens. Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced output price: $2.501 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC is — and Hy4 preview is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC is open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC is not documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC is — and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC: none of these features are definitively sourced. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview?+

Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC has 0 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Hy4 preview has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback