Granite Embedding English r2 vs Qwen3.8 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#10 of 4679.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 52.8–86.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#23 of 44$0.107 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#6 of 3863.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 50.0–66.7
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.65Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$4.951Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens8K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgranite-embedding-english-r2Qwen3.8-Max
DeveloperIBMQwen
FamilyGranite Embedding English R2Qwen3 8 Max
Modelgranite-embedding-english-r2Qwen3.8-Max
Versiongranite-embedding-english-r2Qwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-08-15Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesEmbeddingText
Context window8K1,000K
Total parameters149M2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesembeddingsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Granite Embedding English r2 Capabilities

embeddings
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-embedding-english-r2

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite Embedding English r2 vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite Embedding English r2 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced input price: $1.65 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced output price: $4.951 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Granite Embedding English r2 supports 8K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Granite Embedding English r2 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Granite Embedding English r2 is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Granite Embedding English r2 and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

Granite Embedding English r2 is not documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite Embedding English r2 is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.

Do Granite Embedding English r2 and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite Embedding English r2: none of these features are definitively sourced. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Granite Embedding English r2 has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite Embedding English r2 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback