Granite Embedding English r2 vs Kimi K3

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#17 of 4670.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#30 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#21 of 3852.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.85Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$14.25Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens8K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgranite-embedding-english-r2Kimi-K3
DeveloperIBMMoonshot AI
FamilyGranite Embedding English R2Kimi K3
Modelgranite-embedding-english-r2Kimi-K3
Versiongranite-embedding-english-r2Kimi-K3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-08-152026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesEmbeddingText
Context window8K1,049K
Total parameters149M2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
Licenseapache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesembeddingschat, generation, reasoning

Granite Embedding English r2 Capabilities

embeddings
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-embedding-english-r2

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite Embedding English r2 vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite Embedding English r2 and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3?+

Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced input price: $2.85 per million tokens. Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced output price: $14.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Granite Embedding English r2 supports 8K and Kimi K3 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Granite Embedding English r2 is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can Granite Embedding English r2 and Kimi K3 understand images?+

Granite Embedding English r2 is not documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite Embedding English r2 is — and Kimi K3 is —.

Do Granite Embedding English r2 and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite Embedding English r2: none of these features are definitively sourced. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3?+

Granite Embedding English r2 has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite Embedding English r2 or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback