Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,362.5592% of row best · rating · granite-4.2-30b; 95% CI [1351.93384890, 1373.17607017]; votes 3287; rank 177 | 1,479.03100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1473.99485495, 1484.06002682]; votes 23768; rank 14 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | IBM | Meta |
| Family | Granite 4 2 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-08-25 | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 29.3B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite 4.2 30B and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.16 per million tokens. Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced output price: $0.65 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger sourced context window. Granite 4.2 30B supports 131K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Granite 4.2 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Granite 4.2 30B is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Granite 4.2 30B and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite 4.2 30B is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.
Do Granite 4.2 30B and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Granite 4.2 30B has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Granite 4.2 30B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.