gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,365.9195% of row best · rating · gpt-oss-120b; 95% CI [1361.54274876, 1370.28718499]; votes 29935; rank 172 | 1,439.99100% of row best · rating · hy3; 95% CI [1432.36272776, 1447.61573606]; votes 6911; rank 63 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | gpt-oss-120b | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Openai | Tencent |
| Family | Gpt Oss 120b | Hy3 |
| Model | gpt-oss-120b | Hy3 |
| Version | gpt-oss-120b | Hy3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Total parameters | 116,829,156,672 | 298,786,155,776 |
| Active parameters | 5,100,000,000 | 21,000,000,000 |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Groq (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
16 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
gpt-oss-120b Capabilities
Hy3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Hy3Tencent | vs | Hy4 previewTencent | family variantstext |
gpt-oss-120bOpenai | vs | gpt-oss-20bOpenai | family variantstext |
| vs | gpt-oss-120bOpenai | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Mistral-Medium-3.5-128BMistral AI | vs | gpt-oss-120bOpenai | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | gpt-oss-120bOpenai | cross-developer peerstext | |
Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603Mistral AI | vs | gpt-oss-120bOpenai | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | gpt-oss-120bOpenai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | gpt-oss-120bOpenai | cross-developer peerstext | |
 MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax | vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3 FAQs
Is gpt-oss-120b or Hy3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both gpt-oss-120b and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?+
gpt-oss-120b is $0.037 and Hy3 is $0.132 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric. gpt-oss-120b is $0.17 and Hy3 is $0.528 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?+
Hy3 has the larger sourced context window. gpt-oss-120b supports 131,072 and Hy3 supports 262,144.
Which performs better in benchmarks, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can gpt-oss-120b or Hy3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. gpt-oss-120b is open weight; Hy3 is open weight.
Can gpt-oss-120b and Hy3 understand images?+
gpt-oss-120b is not documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. gpt-oss-120b is — and Hy3 is —.
Do gpt-oss-120b and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+
gpt-oss-120b: reasoning and tool calling. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?+
gpt-oss-120b has 7 sourced provider routes; Hy3 has 3, so gpt-oss-120b has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.