GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.2
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | GPT-5.2OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #46 of 460.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 0.0–33.3 | #33 of 4649.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #28 of 44$0.161 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #34 of 3844.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.025Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $1.75Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $14.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 400K | 400K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 20.7124% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (Medium) | 86.17100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 2.615% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (High) | 52.91100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader | 27.5561% of row best · percent · GPT-5-nano-2025-08-07 (Prompt) | 45.27100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2-2025-12-11 (Prompt) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,319.7293% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1312.87607943, 1326.57003978]; votes 8128; rank 218 | 1,412.43100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1409.21136225, 1415.65317114]; votes 78967; rank 125 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,159.1094% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1148.05999135, 1170.13906838]; votes 3948; rank 100 | 1,229.44100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1223.25930119, 1235.62760198]; votes 18997; rank 68 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 61.6279% of row best · points · GPT-5 nano · 7,465 output tokens / case | 78.08100% of row best · points · GPT-5.2 · 4,266 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 5 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Family | Gpt 5 | Gpt 5 2 |
| Model | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.2 |
| Version | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.2 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2025-12-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-05-31 | 2025-08-31 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 400K | 400K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
GPT-5 Nano Capabilities
GPT-5.2 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.2 FAQs
Is GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2?+
GPT-5 Nano is $0.025 and GPT-5.2 is $1.75 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5 Nano is $0.20 and GPT-5.2 is $14.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. GPT-5 Nano is 400K and GPT-5.2 is 400K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2?+
GPT-5.2 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5 Nano is not marked open weight; GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.2 understand images?+
GPT-5 Nano is documented with image input; GPT-5.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5 Nano is 128K and GPT-5.2 is 128K.
Do GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.2 support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-5 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2?+
GPT-5 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.2 has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.2?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.