GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.1
At a Glance
| Compare | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | GPT-5.1OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #46 of 460.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 0.0–33.3 | #37 of 4625.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 17.1–50.5 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.025Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $1.25Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $10.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 400K | 400K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 20.7128% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (Medium) | 72.83100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.1 (Thinking, High) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 2.6115% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (High) | 17.64100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.1 (Thinking, High) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,319.7293% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1312.87607943, 1326.57003978]; votes 8128; rank 218 | 1,422.57100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.1; 95% CI [1418.95842118, 1426.18777801]; votes 42982; rank 100 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,159.1094% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1148.05999135, 1170.13906838]; votes 3948; rank 100 | 1,235.08100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.1; 95% CI [1227.35514387, 1242.80648733]; votes 10205; rank 65 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 61.6281% of row best · points · GPT-5 nano · 7,465 output tokens / case | 75.98100% of row best · points · GPT-5.1 · 3,970 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 4 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Family | Gpt 5 | Gpt 5 1 |
| Model | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.1 |
| Version | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2025-11-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-05-31 | 2024-09-30 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 400K | 400K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
GPT-5 Nano Capabilities
GPT-5.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.1 FAQs
Is GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1?+
GPT-5 Nano is $0.025 and GPT-5.1 is $1.25 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5 Nano is $0.20 and GPT-5.1 is $10.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. GPT-5 Nano is 400K and GPT-5.1 is 400K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1?+
GPT-5.1 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5 Nano is not marked open weight; GPT-5.1 is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.1 understand images?+
GPT-5 Nano is documented with image input; GPT-5.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5 Nano is 128K and GPT-5.1 is 128K.
Do GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-5 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1?+
GPT-5 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.1 has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.