GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.5
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-5.2OpenAI | Grok 4.5xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.75Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $14.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $6.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 400K | 500K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-613c385b0c93 · verified_score · leader | 86.1799% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) | 87.17100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.5 (Medium) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-be40992860f9 · verified_score · leader | 52.91100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) | 52.6499% of row best · percent · Grok 4.5 (Medium) |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,401.1296% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1395.19508120, 1407.03614053]; votes 28212; rank 44 | 1,451.96100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1443.26182849, 1460.65626012]; votes 4965; rank 26 |
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-10-13-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,171.4696% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2-search-non-reasoning; 95% CI [1165.94554809, 1176.98399625]; votes 79796; rank 27 | 1,215.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1210.07957437, 1221.79459071]; votes 76458; rank 13 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,412.1498% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1408.99454704, 1415.29029705]; votes 83855; rank 136 | 1,447.97100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1443.63647354, 1452.30434473]; votes 39896; rank 56 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,229.0195% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1223.02274809, 1235.00649862]; votes 20127; rank 79 | 1,288.17100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1280.98331591, 1295.35286239]; votes 11764; rank 31 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 79.2199% of row best · percent · gpt-5.2-2025-12-11-high · 11,512 output tokens / case | 80.01100% of row best · percent · grok-4.5 · 10,517 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified | 71.3792% of row best · points · GPT-5.2 (no reasoning) · 4,155 output tokens / case | 77.82100% of row best · points · Grok 4.5 (high) · 2,775 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark win | 6 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | xAI |
| Family | Gpt 5 2 | Grok 4 |
| Model | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.5 |
| Version | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.5 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-07-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-08-31 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 400K | 500K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
GPT-5.2 Capabilities
Grok 4.5 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4oOpenAI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
GPT-5 ProOpenAI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
GPT-5.1OpenAI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs | Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.5 FAQs
Is GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5?+
GPT-5.2 is $1.75 and Grok 4.5 is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.2 is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5.2 is $14.00 and Grok 4.5 is $6.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5?+
Grok 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.2 supports 400,000 tokens and Grok 4.5 supports 500,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5?+
Grok 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 7 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.5 understand images?+
GPT-5.2 is documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5?+
GPT-5.2 has a sourced maximum output of 128,000 tokens; Grok 4.5's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5?+
GPT-5.2 has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so GPT-5.2 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.5?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.