GPT-4o Mini vs Inkling
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | InklingThinking Machines Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.075Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.95Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $4.05Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 128K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,286.3289% of row best · rating · gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18; 95% CI [1282.80018045, 1289.83842881]; votes 68697; rank 249 | 1,439.68100% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 58.1373% of row best · points · GPT-4o mini · 1,347 output tokens / case | 79.41100% of row best · points · Inkling · 5,785 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-4o Mini | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Family | Gpt 4o | Inkling |
| Model | GPT-4o Mini | Inkling |
| Version | GPT-4o Mini | Inkling |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-15 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-10-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 128K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 975B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 41B |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision |
GPT-4o Mini Capabilities
Inkling Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-4o Mini vs Inkling FAQs
Is GPT-4o Mini or Inkling better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-4o Mini and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini or Inkling?+
GPT-4o Mini is $0.075 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4o Mini is $0.30 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4o Mini or Inkling?+
Inkling has the larger sourced context window. GPT-4o Mini supports 128K and Inkling supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4o Mini or Inkling?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can GPT-4o Mini or Inkling be self-hosted?+
Inkling is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. GPT-4o Mini is not marked open weight; Inkling is open weight.
Can GPT-4o Mini and Inkling understand images?+
GPT-4o Mini is documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4o Mini or Inkling?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-4o Mini is 16K and Inkling is —.
Do GPT-4o Mini and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-4o Mini: tool calling and image input. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4o Mini or Inkling?+
GPT-4o Mini has 2 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, so Inkling has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, GPT-4o Mini or Inkling?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.