GPT-4o Mini vs Grok 4.6
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | GPT-4o Mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #13 of 2267.6 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #18 of 36$0.097 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #8 of 2256.6 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,286.2289% of row best · rating · gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18; 95% CI [1282.70478675, 1289.73790661]; votes 68698; rank 245 | 1,443.75100% of row best · rating · grok-4.6-high; 95% CI [1433.62910542, 1453.86294509]; votes 3453; rank 55 |
| ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader | 58.1367% of row best · points · GPT-4o mini · 1,347 output tokens / case | 86.61100% of row best · points · Grok 4.6 · 15,575 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-4o Mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | xAI |
| Family | Gpt 4o | Grok 4 |
| Model | GPT-4o Mini | Grok 4.6 |
| Version | GPT-4o Mini | Grok 4.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-10-01 | 2026-02-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 128K | 500K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
14 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
GPT-4o Mini Capabilities
Grok 4.6 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-4o Mini vs Grok 4.6 FAQs
Is GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-4o Mini and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6?+
GPT-4o Mini is $0.075 and Grok 4.6 is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4o Mini is $0.30 and Grok 4.6 is $6.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6?+
Grok 4.6 has the larger sourced context window. GPT-4o Mini supports 128K and Grok 4.6 supports 500K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6?+
Grok 4.6 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-4o Mini is not marked open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-4o Mini and Grok 4.6 understand images?+
GPT-4o Mini is documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-4o Mini is 16K and Grok 4.6 is —.
Do GPT-4o Mini and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-4o Mini: tool calling and image input. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6?+
GPT-4o Mini has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so GPT-4o Mini has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, GPT-4o Mini or Grok 4.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.