Gemma 4 E4B vs Granite 4.2 30B

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · activeGemma 4 E4BVerified Sep 3, 2026
IBM · activeGranite 4.2 30BVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemma 4 E4BGranite 4.2 30B
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindIBM
FamilyGemma 4Granite 4 2
ModelGemma 4 E4BGranite 4.2 30B
VersionGemma 4 E4BGranite 4.2 30B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-022026-08-25
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parametersUnknown29.3B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

15 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemma 4 E4B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.020
Output price$0.10
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-E4B-it

Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.16
Output price$0.65
Serving providers1
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsdeveloper peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 E4B vs Granite 4.2 30B FAQs

Is Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 E4B and Granite 4.2 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Gemma 4 E4B is $0.020 and Granite 4.2 30B is $0.16 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 E4B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 E4B is $0.10 and Granite 4.2 30B is $0.65 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 E4B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemma 4 E4B is 131K and Granite 4.2 30B is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 E4B is open weight; Granite 4.2 30B is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 E4B and Granite 4.2 30B understand images?+

Gemma 4 E4B is documented with image input; Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 E4B is — and Granite 4.2 30B is —.

Do Gemma 4 E4B and Granite 4.2 30B support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 E4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Gemma 4 E4B has 2 sourced provider routes; Granite 4.2 30B has 1, so Gemma 4 E4B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 E4B or Granite 4.2 30B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback