Gemma 4 E4B vs Kimi K3
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Gemma 4 E4B | Kimi-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #11 of 2271.3 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #13 of 2251.7 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 E4B | Kimi-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Moonshot AI |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Kimi K3 |
| Model | Gemma 4 E4B | Kimi-K3 |
| Version | Gemma 4 E4B | Kimi-K3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-02 | 2026-07-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 2.8T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 104B |
| License | apache-2.0 | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning |
15 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemma 4 E4B Capabilities
Kimi K3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 E4B vs Kimi K3 FAQs
Is Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 E4B and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3?+
Gemma 4 E4B is $0.020 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 E4B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 E4B is $0.10 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 E4B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3?+
Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 E4B supports 131K and Kimi K3 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 E4B is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.
Can Gemma 4 E4B and Kimi K3 understand images?+
Gemma 4 E4B is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 E4B is — and Kimi K3 is —.
Do Gemma 4 E4B and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 E4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3?+
Gemma 4 E4B has 2 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 E4B or Kimi K3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.