Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Phi-4 Reasoning
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | Phi-4-reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Microsoft |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Phi 4 Reasoning |
| Model | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | Phi-4-reasoning |
| Version | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | Phi-4-reasoning |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2025-04-30 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 33K |
| Total parameters | 26B | 14.7B |
| Active parameters | 4B | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning |
14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemma 4 26B A4B Capabilities
Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Phi-4 Reasoning FAQs
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Phi-4 Reasoning, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+
Only Gemma 4 26B A4B has a directly sourced input price: $0.070 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 26B A4B has a directly sourced output price: $0.34 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 26B A4B supports 262K and Phi-4 Reasoning supports 33K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 26B A4B is open weight; Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight.
Can Gemma 4 26B A4B and Phi-4 Reasoning understand images?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B is documented with image input; Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 26B A4B is — and Phi-4 Reasoning is —.
Do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Phi-4 Reasoning support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B has 4 sourced provider routes; Phi-4 Reasoning has 0, so Gemma 4 26B A4B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.