DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemma 4 26B-A4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,451.00100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1447.00829245, 1454.98663953]; votes 54243; rank 41 | 1,434.8699% of row best · rating · gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1427.26766156, 1442.45594559]; votes 5814; rank 78 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemma 4 26B-A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro | Gemma 4 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemma 4 26B-A4B |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemma 4 26B-A4B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-03-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | 26B |
| Active parameters | 49B | 4B |
| License | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
17 comparable fields · 12 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities
Gemma 4 26B A4B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma 4 26B A4B FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 and Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.070 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 and Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.34 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K and Gemma 4 26B A4B supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; Gemma 4 26B A4B is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; Gemma 4 26B A4B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro is — and Gemma 4 26B A4B is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Gemma 4 26B A4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; Gemma 4 26B A4B has 4, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.