Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.50Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,198.09100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash-grounding; 95% CI [1193.35426288, 1202.82591975]; votes 149334; rank 151,204.11100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1198.80874858, 1209.41102574]; votes 109553; rank 13
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,442.4099% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1439.30492660, 1445.49388279]; votes 85799; rank 611,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,265.37100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1259.84136462, 1270.89646969]; votes 34860; rank 411,259.55100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3 FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindxAI
FamilyGemini 3Grok 4 20
ModelGemini 3 FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionGemini 3 FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecyclepreviewpreview
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsgeneration, reasoning, research, tools

Gemini 3 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3-flash-preview

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Gemini 3 Flash is $0.50 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3 Flash is $3.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Gemini 3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3 Flash supports 1,049K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3 Flash is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

Gemini 3 Flash is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3 Flash is 66K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do Gemini 3 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Gemini 3 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so Gemini 3 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback