Gemini 3.8 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#8 of 4682.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 54.7–88.0UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#26 of 44$0.160 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#8 of 3860.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 46.7–63.4UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.75Google AI · Sep 2, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.75Google AI · Sep 2, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3.8 FlashNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindNVIDIA
FamilyGemini 3Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Base Bf16
ModelGemini 3.8 FlashNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16
VersionGemini 3.8 FlashNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-022025-12-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-06-25
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parametersUnknown31.6B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, code_execution, computer_use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsgeneration

Gemini 3.8 Flash Capabilities

chatcode executioncomputer usegenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.8-flash

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 FAQs

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.8 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.75 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $3.75 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 be self-hosted?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.8 Flash is not marked open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is open weight.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 understand images?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 66K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 supports 131K output tokens.

Do Gemini 3.8 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 has 0, so Gemini 3.8 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.8 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback