Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #4 of 5790.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #17 of 27$0.160 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9 | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #7 of 2758.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.75Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.75Google AI ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.75Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $3.75Google AI ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-302d8267c052 · verified_score · leader | 95.5097% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.7 Flash (High) | 98.50100% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-bca68e12cc9a · verified_score · leader | 84.5895% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.7 Flash (High) | 89.17100% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) |
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-10-16-a64ca3b12b6e · outcome_score · leader | -0.7296% of row best · score · Gemini 3.7 Flash (High); 95% CI [-1.64184585, 0.19418642]; sessions 54989; observations 4923541; rank 32 | 3.75100% of row best · score · Gemini 3.8 Flash (High); 95% CI [2.64957678, 4.84993702]; sessions 37692; observations 5316787; rank 15 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,315.97100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.7-flash-high; 95% CI [1306.20108292, 1325.73138242]; votes 4524; rank 6 | 1,314.08100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.8-flash-high; 95% CI [1303.54395703, 1324.61562115]; votes 3792; rank 8 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 83.15100% of row best · percent · gemini-3.7-flash-high · 22,610 output tokens / case | 80.8597% of row best · percent · gemini-3.8-flash-high · 42,786 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified | 70.06100% of row best · points · Gemini 3.7 Flash (high thinking) · 20,208 output tokens / case | 70.22100% of row best · points · Gemini 3.8 Flash (high thinking) · 20,369 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie | 1 benchmark win | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Version | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, code_execution, computer_use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemini 3.7 Flash Capabilities
Gemini 3.8 Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 LunaOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini Deep ResearchGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini Computer UseGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.1OpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash FAQs
Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash is $0.75 and Gemini 3.8 Flash is $0.75 per million tokens, so they are tied on this metric. Gemini 3.7 Flash is $3.75 and Gemini 3.8 Flash is $3.75 per million tokens, so they are tied on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,048,576 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash?+
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.7 Flash is not marked open weight; Gemini 3.8 Flash is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash understand images?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash is documented with image input; Gemini 3.8 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash?+
Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 65,536 tokens each.
Do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash?+
Gemini 3.7 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.8 Flash has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.