Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#8 of 4682.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 54.7–88.0UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#26 of 44$0.160 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#8 of 3860.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 46.7–63.4UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.75Google AI · Sep 2, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.75Google AI · Sep 2, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.71100% of row best · score · Gemini 3.8 Flash (High); 95% CI [2.80246501, 6.61533867]; sessions 12534; observations 712246; rank 13-1.7794% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [-2.69255217, -0.84918781]; sessions 33094; observations 1437075; rank 32
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,494.67100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.8-flash-high; 95% CI [1486.13928353, 1503.20869643]; votes 5076; rank 61,489.44100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.95697715, 1499.92080617]; votes 3227; rank 11
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader80.8599% of row best · percent · gemini-3.8-flash-high · 42,786 output tokens / case81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie1 benchmark winNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMeta
FamilyGemini 3Muse Spark
ModelGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2
VersionGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-09-022026-08-05
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, code_execution, computer_use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

Gemini 3.8 Flash Capabilities

chatcode executioncomputer usegenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.8-flash

Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.75 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $3.75 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: The verified common benchmarks do not produce a majority winner.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.8 Flash is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 66K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, so Gemini 3.8 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback