Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Hy3Tencent
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#8 of 4682.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 54.7–88.0UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#26 of 44$0.160 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#8 of 3860.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 46.7–63.4UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.75Google AI · Sep 2, 2026$0.13Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.75Google AI · Sep 2, 2026$0.528Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHy3
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.71100% of row best · score · Gemini 3.8 Flash (High); 95% CI [2.80246501, 6.61533867]; sessions 12534; observations 712246; rank 13-5.2391% of row best · score · Hy3; 95% CI [-6.39472360, -4.07137134]; sessions 27371; observations 992576; rank 35
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,494.67100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.8-flash-high; 95% CI [1486.13928353, 1503.20869643]; votes 5076; rank 61,440.5896% of row best · rating · hy3; 95% CI [1433.39024152, 1447.77894384]; votes 8047; rank 65
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3.8 FlashHy3
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindTencent
FamilyGemini 3Hy3
ModelGemini 3.8 FlashHy3
VersionGemini 3.8 FlashHy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-02Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parametersUnknown298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, code_execution, computer_use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, tools

Gemini 3.8 Flash Capabilities

chatcode executioncomputer usegenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.8-flash

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hy3 FAQs

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash is $0.75 and Hy3 is $0.13 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.8 Flash is $3.75 and Hy3 is $0.528 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1,049K and Hy3 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Hy3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.8 Flash is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hy3 understand images?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash is documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 66K and Hy3 is —.

Do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback