Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-6 Astra
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#14 of 2266.5 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#10 of 36$0.055 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#5 of 2261.6 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader91.1793% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)98.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-6 Astra (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader60.4264% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)95.00100% of row best · percent · GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · activeGemini 3.6 FlashVerified Aug 29, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-6 AstraVerified Sep 4, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-6 Astra
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGemini 3Gpt 6
ModelGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-6 Astra
VersionGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,050K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

13 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemini 3.6 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.75
Output price$3.75
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.6-flash

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?+

Gemini 3.6 Flash is $0.75 and GPT-6 Astra is $10.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.6 Flash is $3.75 and GPT-6 Astra is $50.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1,049K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.6 Flash is not marked open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Gemini 3.6 Flash is documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 66K and GPT-6 Astra supports 128K output tokens.

Do Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.6 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?+

Gemini 3.6 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback