Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Jev
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind |  JevTypeSafe |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #39 of 4617.6 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #8 of 44$0.029 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #32 of 3846.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.042TypeSafe ↗ · Sep 17, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.000TypeSafe ↗ · Sep 17, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 64K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 17, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Jev |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | TypeSafe |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Jev |
| Model | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Jev |
| Version | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Jev |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-09-15 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Model-specific input |
| Output modalities | Text | Model-specific input |
| Context window | 1,049K | 64K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | TypeSafe (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | calibrated-confidence, parallel-evaluation, structured_outputs, typed-decisions |
| Maximum Choice cardinality | Unknown | 255 options |
| Default request rate limit | Unknown | 1200 requests per minute |
| State plus longest question limit | Unknown | 32000 tokens |
| Combined state and questions limit | Unknown | 64000 tokens |
| Default token rate limit | Unknown | 250000 tokens per second |
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Capabilities
Jev Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Jev FAQs
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Jev, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $0.30 and Jev is $0.042 per million tokens, so Jev is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $2.50 and Jev is $0.000 per million tokens, so Jev is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite supports 1,049K and Jev supports 64K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is not marked open weight; Jev is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Jev understand images?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is documented with image input; Jev is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 66K and Jev is —.
Do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Jev support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Jev: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 2 sourced provider routes; Jev has 1, so Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Jev?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.