Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.5
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMind |  GPT-5.5OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #7 of 4683.9 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #38 of 44$0.341 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #18 of 3853.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.25Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $5.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $30.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,050K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 71.3086% of row best · points · Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · 1,628 output tokens / case | 82.60100% of row best · points · GPT-5.5 (xhigh) · 4,050 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Gpt 5 5 |
| Model | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.5 |
| Version | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.5 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-04-23 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-12-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,050K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Capabilities
GPT-5.5 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.5 FAQs
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5?+
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is $0.25 and GPT-5.5 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is $1.50 and GPT-5.5 is $30.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5?+
GPT-5.5 has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports 1,049K and GPT-5.5 supports 1,050K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is not marked open weight; GPT-5.5 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5.5 understand images?+
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is documented with image input; GPT-5.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5?+
GPT-5.5 has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports 66K and GPT-5.5 supports 128K output tokens.
Do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5.5 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5?+
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.5 has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.5?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.