Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#22 of 36$0.161 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader71.3089% of row best · points · Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · 1,628 output tokens / case79.89100% of row best · points · Gemini 3.1 Pro (high thinking) · 10,009 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · activeGemini 3.1 Flash LiteVerified Aug 29, 2026
Google DeepMind · previewGemini 3.1 ProVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindGoogle DeepMind
FamilyGemini 3Gemini 3
ModelGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro
VersionGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image, Video, Audio, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

13 comparable fields · 3 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.25
Output price$1.50
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$12.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.1-pro-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Pro FAQs

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is $0.25 and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is $1.50 and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $12.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is 1,049K and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is not marked open weight; Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Pro understand images?+

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is documented with image input; Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is 66K and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 66K.

Do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.1 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback