ERNIE X1.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens66K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE X1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperBaiduxAI
FamilyErnie X1Grok 4 20
ModelERNIE X1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionERNIE X1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2025-09-26Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window66K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolsgeneration, reasoning, research, tools

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE X1.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE X1.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

ERNIE X1.1 is $1.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so ERNIE X1.1 is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE X1.1 is $4.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE X1.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE X1.1 is 66K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do ERNIE X1.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

ERNIE X1.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, ERNIE X1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback