ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.65Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$3.25Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE 5.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
DeveloperBaiduQwen
FamilyErnie 5Qwen3 Coder
ModelERNIE 5.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
VersionERNIE 5.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-09-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessBaidu Qianfan (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, search, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

ERNIE 5.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-5.1

Qwen3 Coder Plus Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3-coder-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus FAQs

Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?+

ERNIE 5.1 is $4.00 and Qwen3 Coder Plus is $0.65 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE 5.1 is $18.00 and Qwen3 Coder Plus is $3.25 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?+

Qwen3 Coder Plus has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 5.1 supports 131K and Qwen3 Coder Plus supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight; Qwen3 Coder Plus is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus understand images?+

ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input; Qwen3 Coder Plus is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 5.1 is 66K and Qwen3 Coder Plus is —.

Do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Qwen3 Coder Plus: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?+

ERNIE 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Qwen3 Coder Plus has 2, so Qwen3 Coder Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback